Legal Opinion

Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commercial State Bank of Rantoul

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided June 11, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Originally defendant brought suit at law against the plaintiff to recover upon a surety bond of $10,000 dated December 23, 1920, and effective January 1, 1921, indemnifying the defendant against the fraud or dishonesty of its cashier, one Robinson, as hereinafter set forth. Three annual premium payments were averred to have been made in due •course, and defendant sought to recover for losses in each of the three years, 1921, 1922, -and 1923.- Plaintiff thereupon filed its bill in equity, herein, seeking an injunction against the suit at law, a discovery, an accounting,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. CassidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. People ex rel. Kasson v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Columbia Hospital for Women and Lying-In Asylum v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Hack v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Brulatour v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Peoples Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API