Legal Opinion

Gandy v. Klaw

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1921No. Appeal, No. 124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 124, Jan. T., 1921, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, PMla. Co., March T., 1918, No. 836, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George S. Gandy v. Marc Klaw, Abraham L. Erlanger, Samuel F. Nirdlinger and J. Fred Zimmerman, jointly and severally, and Marc Klaw and Abraham L. Erlanger, trading as Klaw & Erlanger, and Samuel F. Nirdlinger and J. Fred Zimmerman, trading as Nixon & Zimmerman, individually, jointly and severally (Arthur S. Arnold, A. L.…

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 124, Jan. T., 1921, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, PMla. Co., March T., 1918, No. 836, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George S. Gandy v. Marc Klaw, Abraham L. Erlanger, Samuel F. Nirdlinger and J. Fred Zimmerman, jointly and severally, and Marc Klaw and Abraham L. Erlanger, trading as Klaw & Erlanger, and Samuel F. Nirdlinger and J. Fred Zimmerman, trading as Nixon & Zimmerman, individually, jointly and severally (Arthur S. Arnold, A. L. Erlanger and Real Estate Title Ins. & Trust Co., executors, substituted as defendants for Samuel F. Nirdlinger. Assumpsit for…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

George S. Gandy was the owner of a certain theatre building, located in the City of Philadelphia, with the furniture contained therein. On September 19,1910, he contracted to lease the property to the Peoples’ Theatre Company for a period of five years, to commence from August 15, 1911. By the terms of the written contract it was provided that the lessee should keep and maintain both the exterior and interior of the demised premises in good condition and repair, and should deliver up the same at the expiration of the term “in the same good condition, order and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bash v. BashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  2. Forrest v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Darlington v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. United States Horse Shoe Co. v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Nowlis v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. BuckmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Gertrude Normile v. MartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Borough of Austin v. A. & P. Corrugated Box Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API