Legal Opinion

M. E. Gruber, Inc. v. Eubank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Two questions are presented by the record: •

T. Does the language in the deeds, constituting plaintiff’s chain of title, create an easement across the said.land known as the Jerusalem Trail?

2. If not, has such easement to said strip of land, known as the Jerusalem Trail, been acquired by prescription?

It must be observed at the outset that no person or group of persons is claiming an easement across plaintiff’s land or attempting to assert any right to use that strip of land described in the case as the Jerusalem Trail. The plaintiff has brought this suit against the defendants, alleging that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. McCormick v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Draper v. Conner & Walters Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. City of Durham v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Thompson v. . UmbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API