Legal Opinion
Houston v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 2011No. 1445 C.D. 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Civil Division (trial court) granting Claudette Houston and Louise Board’s (together, Appellees) motion for partial summary judgment and injunctive relief and declaring that SEPTA is required to comply with the mandates of Section 1797 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) 1 when calculating payment of personal injury protection benefits on behalf of eligible claimants.
The facts of this case are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Manley v. FitzgeraldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Petrosky v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Rarick v. Federated Serv. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Pavelko v. Unitrin Direct Auto Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2014