Legal Opinion

Pavelko v. Unitrin Direct Auto Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided June 12, 2014No. 11190 of 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

COX, J.,

Before the court for disposition are the preliminary objections filed on behalf of the defendant Unitrin Direct Auto Insurance a/k/a Unitrin Direct Property and Casualty Company, which argue the plaintiff’s amended complaint is legally insufficient as an insurance provider does not have a duty to adjust the amount of medical expenses due in order to postpone the exhaustion of first party benefits nor is the insurance provider required to pay medical bills according to the fee schedule amount as provided in 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1797.

The plaintiff Valerie Pavelko maintained an automobile…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Lerner v. LernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Hess v. Fox Rothschild, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Cardenas v. SchoberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API