Legal Opinion

State v. Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2009No. C031920CR, A123372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, which vacated our prior decision, State v. Tarkington, 205 Or App 473, 134 P3d 1104 (2006) (Tarkington I), in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or 505, 173 P3d 817 (2007), adh’d to as modified on recons, 344 Or 195, 179 P3d 673 (2008). State v. Tarkington, 345 Or 316, 195 P3d 64 (2008). In Tarkington I, we remanded for resentencing because the court had imposed an upward departure sentence on defendant’s conviction for possession of a forgery device, ORS 165.032, based on judicial factfinding, in violation of her rights under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TATARINOVCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API