Legal Opinion
Ice v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 11, 1938No. 28212PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment against his employers for personal injuries sustained on account of the negligence of a fellow employee -while the two employees were moving a pipe line on premises being operated by the defendants under an oil and gas lease, and the defendants appeal.
The defendants did not carry workmen’s compensation insurance and the plaintiff therefore elected to prosecute his claim in the district court under the provisions of section 13352, O. S. 1931, 85 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 12, instead of filing it in the State Industrial Commission. That section deprives…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hogan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Seismograph Service Corp. v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- McCowan v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- McQueen & Johnson, Inc. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.