Legal Opinion
Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Romy Hammes Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 13, 1960No. 38406; 38407PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
In support of their motion to quash the new process the defendants McCoy and Peoples Loan & Finance Corporation contend that since the prayers of the amendment itself do not contain a prayer for the issuance or service of process, the clerk was without authority to issue the new process of June 25th. This argument is without merit. In McCoy v. Romy Hammes Corp., 99 Ga. App. 513, 516, supra, this court stated that “the proper procedure would have been for the plaintiff to amend his prayer for process so that legal process could issue.” In Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. HollomonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Cy Owens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- McCoy v. Romy Hammes CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Mize v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Burch v. Crown LaundryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burrow v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965