Legal Opinion

State v. Ratumaimuri

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2018No. S-17-187PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunke, J.

The Lancaster County District Court convicted Antonio Y. Ratumaimuri of violating the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA). 1 Before the Nebraska Court of Appeals, Ratumaimuri assigned as error that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Specifically, he argued the State had failed to prove he was subject to SORA's requirements, because it failed to present evidence that-during the proceedings for a previous conviction and sentence-the county court for Lancaster County had made a factual finding pursuant to § 29-4003(1)(b)(i)(B).

The Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BocheNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fetherkile v. FetherkileNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re Estate of ClingerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Sanders v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. WoffordNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. PaulyNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. WheelerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. In re Henry B. Wilson, Jr., Revocable TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. ThalmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API