Legal Opinion
Waldes Kohinoor, Inc. v. Industrial Retaining Ring Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 1, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 229-58PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and of the subject matter of this case. 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
Plaintiff is a corporation of the State of New York, and maintains its principal place of business in that State. The individual defendants are citizens of the State of New Jersey and constitute a partnership doing business as Industrial Retaining Ring Company in the Town of Irvington in that State. Venue is properly laid in this District. 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
Eight separate causes of action are set forth in the complaint, upon each of which issue has been duly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Auto. Ass'n (Incorporated) v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Maloney-Crawford Tank Corp. v. Sauder Tank Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Maloney-Crawford Tank Corporation and the Fish Investment Corporation v. Sauder Tank Company, Inc., Maloney-Crawford Tank Corporation and the Fish Investment Corporation v. Sauder Tank Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972