United States v. Robert Nello Brackeen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This court has convened en banc to determine whether bank robbery necessarily involves “dishonesty,” as that term is used in Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(2). The question arises in the context of whether a witness can be impeached by evidence of prior convictions. Faced with intra-circuit precedents which provide irreconcilably conflicting answers to the question, the original pane! called sua sponte for en banc review. See Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., 810 F.2d 1477, 1479 (9th Cir.1987) (en banc), rev’d on other grounds, 490 U.S. 642, 109 S.Ct. 2115, 104 L.Ed.2d 733 (1989). We now…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- E. Scott McHenry v. Samuel ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lorenzo Jesus Mejia-AlarconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MeachamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Mohamed Jawara, Also Known as Haji JawaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.