Legal Opinion

Galloway v. Pace Oil Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1983No. 825SC252PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The first question on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs claim is barred by the statute of limitations, G.S. 1-52(3), which provides:

Within three years an action —

* * *(3) For trespass upon real property. When the trespass is a continuing one, the action shall be commenced within three years from the original trespass, and not thereafter.

All the evidence shows the oil refinery was completed in 1972 and the drainage problems began occurring shortly thereafter. If the interference with the drainage from the plaintiffs land during periods of rainfall was a continuing trespass, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cox v. Cambridge Square Towne Houses, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Duval v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Roberts v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Teseneer v. Henrietta Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Vinal v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  5. Shults v. Champion International Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API