Legal Opinion
United States v. Pollmann
District Court, D. Montana
Decided August 29, 1973No. Crim. 4472PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMESON, District Judge.
The information charges that the defendant, Harlan Frank Pollmann, “did without lawful authority or permission, willfully and knowingly go upon land * * * a portion of Flathead Lake * * belonging to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Indian Tribes, for the purpose of fishing thereon, contrary to the provision of 18 U.S.C., Section 1165.” 1 The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, attacking the sufficiency of the information and the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1165, and contending that the Tribes have no right to regulate the use of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. NamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BouchardDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- United States v. James Junior FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. FelterDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.