Legal Opinion

United States v. James Junior Finch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1977No. 75-2149PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

This case began when James Junior Finch stood on a bank of the Big Horn River and cast a fishing lure into the waters. He was charged by information with trespassing on Indian lands, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1165. The bank and the bed of the Big Horn River at the point where Finch stood lie within the exterior boundaries of the Crow Indian Reservation. All concede that the State of Montana owns the bank at that spot, having acquired the property by purchase. The state’s chain of title can be traced to a Crow Indian who acquired the land by allotment.

Finch held a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Finch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Colville Confederated Tribes v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Juan Gerardo RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Greely v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API