Legal Opinion

Rao v. Gunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Transit Authority which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of misconduct and terminated his employment, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), dated January 15, 1985, which granted the petition and directed that petitioner be reinstated to his former position with back pay.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with Special Term’s finding that the New York City Transit Authority terminated petitioner’s employment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Economico v. Village of PelhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Johnson v. Director, Downstate Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Marsh v. HanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Pollman v. FaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Brockman v. SkidmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moorehead v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API