Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Howell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 10, 1984No. 83-187Published
1Opinion of the Court
447 So.2d 661 (1984)
Ex parte Bobby J. HOWELL.
(In re Bobby J. HOWELL v. Henry M. LEIMAN, et al.)
83-187.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 10, 1984.
James Whitmire of Brewer, Lentz, Nelson & Whitmire, Decatur, for petitioner.
William B. Eyster of Eyster, Key, Tubb, Weaver & Roth, Decatur, for respondents.
BEATTY, Justice.
Petition for writ of mandamus to issue to the Honorable Rudolph W. Slate, Judge of the Circuit Court of Morgan County. The writ is granted.
The petitioner, Bobby J. Howell, sustained personal injuries in an accident while employed as a construction worker for Henry M. Leiman, Inc.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnny L. Southern, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee v. Plumb Tools, a Division of O'Ames CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Frank C. Joyner, American Motorists Insurance Company v. F & B Enterprises, Inc. T/a Naylor JewelersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.