Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1941No. 6 Div. 802PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This action is by the insurance carrier as subrogee of the injured workman, who elected to proceed against the employer under the Workman’s Compensation Act, Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 253 et seq., and whose compensation has been ascertained, adjudged and is payable, under said act. The action is against a third person who, as alleged negligently caused the injury, and also subject to said act.

The complaint consists of two counts. Count one avers, in short, that the plain tiff as such insurance carrier has been subrogated to the right of the injured workman who received his injuries…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Alabama Great Soiitliern Railroad v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Georgia Casualty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Larue v. C. G. Kershaw Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jim Beard and Hubbard Beard v. Melvin StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. City of Birmingham v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API