Legal Opinion

State v. Conkle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1998No. 98CA0005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Appellant John H. Conkle appeals from the judgment of the Wayne County Municipal Court imposing as a condition of his probation that Conkle have no contact with his wife or her residence or her property during the period of probation. We affirm.

In August 1997, Conkle was charged with resisting arrest, in violation of R.C. 2921.33, and domestic violence, in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A). The charges apparently stem from an incident on August 3, 1997, when Conkle struck his wife several times and then resisted when three officers attempted to arrest him. Conkle pled no contest to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. LivingstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. MuellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. AndrasakOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. BrillhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Lambert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API