Legal Opinion
Anthony v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1934No. A-8630PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of the crime of larceny by fraud, and sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary and to pay the cost of prosecution, from which judgment and sentence the defendant appeals.
The testimony on behalf of the state, in substance, is as follows: That a short while before the 20th of November, 1931, W. E. Groves was operating a filling station and tourist camp in Tulsa, Okla. He was approached at his filling station by two men who gave their names as Henson and Rockwell, who- asked about a man by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Elkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Ireton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Rich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCluskey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Bisanar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Rapp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Loudermilk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.