McCluskey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BUSSEY, Judge.
In order to fully understand the assignments of error raised in this appeal it will be necessary to consider in some detail the factual situation and circumstances which existed at and before the time the defendant, J. G. McCluskey allegedly committed the offense with which he was charged, that of forgery in the second degree by uttering a forged instrument.
The defendant was employed in the State Department of Agriculture in the capacity of Finance Director. The Department of Agriculture consisted of nine divisions. Each division was administered by an executive in charge and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Stidham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Brinlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.