Legal Opinion

Roark v. Crabtree

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1995No. 940052PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

Plaintiff Mechelle Roark appeals from the trial court’s order granting defendant Jack Crabtree’s motion to dismiss her complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 1 Roark claims that the trial court erred in refusing to apply Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25.1 retroactively to her claims against Crabtree. We affirm.

In reviewing the trial court’s decision to grant Crabtree’s rule 12(b)(6) motion, we accept Roark’s factual allegations as true and draw all reasonable inferences from those facts in a light…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. HiggsUtah Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. Apotex Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. LuskUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Savage v. Utah Youth VillageUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API