Legal Opinion

State Bank of Medford v. Curran

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Under the pleadings, the only issue of fact is the number of animals sold to Niemuth which were subject to plaintiffs chattel mortgage. Plaintiff submitted affidavits of persons who heard the president of Rogers Farms, Inc., admit that the 35 animals sold to Niemuth constituted security under the mortgage. Such admissions were evidentiary facts sufficient to establish plaintiff’s cause of action. Plaintiff was thus entitled to summary judgment unless defendant, by affidavit or other proof showed facts sufficient to entitle him to a trial.1

Defendant produced no evidentiary facts tending to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Leuchtenberg v. HoeschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Edwards v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Forbus v. City of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API