Legal Opinion

Thunderbird Investment Corp. v. Rothschild

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 1971No. Civ. 36996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HERNDON, Acting P. J.

Statement of the Case

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment entered in this action wherein they have claimed that defendants charged them a usurious rate of interest in a 1963 loan transaction in which they borrowed $300,000 from defendants. This loan was evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a deed of trust on real property.

The basic issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the loan transaction involved the collection of interest that was usurious as a matter of law. On the basis of its findings of fact, the trial court concluded and held that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Niles v. KavanaghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Ocean Park Bath House & Amusement Co. v. Pacific Auto Park Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Winnett v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Orden v. Crawshaw Mortgage & Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Del Mar v. CaspeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API