Legal Opinion
Miller v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided March 8, 2000No. CA CR 99-550PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Steele HAYS, Special Judge.
Appellants Stephen and Janette Miller were charged with manufacturing marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia in the Circuit Court of Washington County. They moved to suppress the evidence seized under a search warrant. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied the motion to suppress and the Millers entered written conditional pleas of guilty pursuant Rule 24.3 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. On appeal they maintain the ruling of the circuit court should be reversed. We disagree.
On the morning of October 22, 1998, the Millers were stopped for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Joaquin Garcia, Joaquin Garcia v. Margaret C. Hambrick, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000