Pence v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The applicant was determined to be a defective delinquent in - 1961, and upon proceedings before Judge Byrnes, sitting with out a jury, for redetermination of his defective delinquency he was found to be still a defective delinquent in 1963. He was represented by counsel on both occasions, and on this application he is represented by the same counsel who represented him at the redetermination hearing.
The only ground asserted in support of this application is that “the Trial Court erred in allowing the entire record of the Applicant into evidence at his redetermination hearing as to his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schultz v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Queen v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Colbert v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Creswell v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCloskey v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- McCubbin v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Boitnott v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Hirons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- State v. LewisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974