Legal Opinion

Creswell v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1964No. [App. No. 126, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to appeal from a redetermination of defective delinquency. At the first hearing, in 1961, the reports of Dr. Boslow, the Director of Patuxent, and Dr. Lerner, the applicant’s duly appointed private psychiatrist, were in evidence and were considered by the jury in its finding of delinquency. The conclusion of both reports was that the applicant was a defective delinquent as defined in Code (1957), Art. 31B, sec. 5. The applicant was represented by court-appointed counsel and no application for leave to appeal was filed from this finding. At the redetermination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Brown v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johns v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Pence v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. McCloskey v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Campion v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Jenkins v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API