Legal Opinion
Gerald Glen Boyden v. Barry Rubin Working Alternatives, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1995No. 93-56356Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
46 F.3d 1138
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Gerald Glen BOYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Barry RUBIN; Working Alternatives, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-56356.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1995.*
Decided Jan. 20, 1995.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Carol Van Strum Paul E. Merrell v. John C. LawnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- McDougal v. County of ImperialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.