State v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant, who was convicted of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, appeals his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights. In particular, defendant asserts that the trial court should have suppressed evidence of statements that he made while in compelling circumstances, because he had not been advised of his Miranda rights. As explained below, we agree with defendant that his rights under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution were violated. We therefore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Moore/CoenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CoenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009