Legal Opinion
Berlen v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 25, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
291 N.J. Super. 542 (1996)
677 A.2d 1150
NICHOLAS A. BERLEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 29, 1996.
Decided June 25, 1996.
Before Judges SKILLMAN and EICHEN, JJ.
William P. Wielechowski argued the cause for appellant (Horn, Shechtman & Hirsch, P.A., attorney; Mr. Wielechowski on the brief).
James Savage argued the cause for respondent (Ruprecht & Hart, attorneys; Mr. Savage, of counsel and on the brief).
The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Polizzi v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAILNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998