Legal Opinion

United States v. Kuehl

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 8, 1981No. 39,472; NCM 79 1503PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant was tried by a special court-martial with military judge alone at the Naval Legal Services Office, San Diego, California. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of extortion, assault, and wrongful communication of a threat, in violation of Articles 127,128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 927, 928, and 934, respectively. The sentence imposed was a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor and partial forfeitures for 6 months. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. SyroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CofieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. TaylorU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. ElstonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API