United States v. Kuehl
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The appellant was tried by a special court-martial with military judge alone at the Naval Legal Services Office, San Diego, California. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of extortion, assault, and wrongful communication of a threat, in violation of Articles 127,128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 927, 928, and 934, respectively. The sentence imposed was a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor and partial forfeitures for 6 months. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. SyroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
4Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. CofieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. TaylorU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. ElstonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.