Legal Opinion

Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1988No. 123PA86PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

As the case comes before us it is an action against accountants for negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiffs, creditors of Intercontinental Metals Corporation (“IMC”), allege they incurred damages when they extended credit to IMC in reliance on incorrect information contained in an audit report on IMC’s financial status prepared for IMC by defendants. Plaintiffs claim defendants were negligent in their preparation of the report.

Interesting questions of first impression are presented. The first deals with whether plaintiffs who have relied on financial information in an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Hudson-Cole Development Corp. v. BeemerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Dallaire v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API