Legal Opinion

People v. Ruppel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 22, 1999No. 4-98-0411PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Patricia Ruppel, defendant, appeals her conviction for driving with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) over .10. 625 ILCS 5/11—501(a)(1) (West 1996). Most of defendant’s arguments relate to the admissibility of involuntary blood test results that indicated defendant had a BAG of .228. Defendant argues (1) the State failed to show it had probable cause to arrest her or to perform the blood test; (2) the blood sample was not lawfully drawn; (3) the State failed to provide an adequate foundation for the blood test results; and (4) the trial court erred by allowing the State to reopen its case…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. CabreraIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Fink v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. O'QUINNAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. ForcumAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. BoomerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. People v. HarrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API