Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2005No. 97710 RelPublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Afterward, hospital personnel administered blood and urine tests at the request of the arresting officer, but without defendant’s consent. In defendant’s DUI proceedings, he moved to suppress the results of the blood and urine tests on the ground the tests were nonconsensual. The circuit court granted defendant’s motion and ordered suppression of the test results. The State appealed, and the appellate court affirmed the suppression order. This court granted the State’s petition for leave to appeal. The issue before us is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MikuschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re May 1991 Will County Grand JuryIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. PhelpsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Blum v. KosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API