Legal Opinion

Alford v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 8, 2016No. 14-304 L and 14-1120 LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Subject Matter Jurisdiction, State law claims

OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge

This consolidated action is before the court on defendant’s partial motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs primarily claim that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Craps”) effected a Fifth Amendment taking of their property 'by diverting flood waters from the Mississippi River onto their property, which is located in Warrant County, Mississippi. But in addition to seeking relief under the Fifth Amendment, plaintiffs also argue that this action by the Corps violated the takings clause of the Mississippi…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API