Christian v. Pan Am Southern Corp.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
This case turns upon this question: Does the fraudulent material alteration of a written instrument extinguish the consideration for which it was given? The Chancellor ruled it did not. The parties aggrieved, Christian and wife, have appealed.
Prior to February 25, 1955, complainants Tommy W. Christian, Jr., and wife, Juanita Christian (hereinafter called Christians) owned a filling station on Brainerd Road in Chattanooga. When they acquired it, there was resting thereon a lease held by Pan Am Southern Co. (hereinafter called Pan Am), dated March 15, 1946, for the term expiring June 30, 1956,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- A. Landreth Co. v. SchevenelTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Vogle v. RipperIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.