Legal Opinion

LaBonte v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 7, 1989No. 87-C-0199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

WARREN, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are defendant’s Motions in Limine: (1) for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff is not eligible for coverage under the group policy; (2) to exclude under F.R. Evid. 402 evidence of premium payments made after Connecticut General learned of plaintiff’s ineligibility for coverage; (3) to exclude under F.R.Evid. 402, 702, and 704 the testimony of plaintiff’s bad faith expert; (4) to exclude under F.R.Evid. 402 evidence concerning the cost of Nadine LaBonte’s past or future care for the purpose of proving damages;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Crawford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Schuster v. Germantown Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nolden v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ryder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fox Ex Rel. Fricker v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Fox Ex Rel. Fricker v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fox v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Fox v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API