Miller v. Mutual Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, .1.
Count 2 of the complaint'is to recover amount due “for goods, wares, and merchandise sold by plaintiff to the defendant or at their instance or request.”
When liability is alleged on two or more grounds, stated in the alternative, the count is demurrable unless a good cause of action is shown under each alternative. Construed most strongly against the pleader, a sale at the “instance” of defendant may mean at his “solicitation” or “suggestion.” Webster’s International Diet.
Clearly a sale may be made to one person at the solicitation or on the suggestion of another, without the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henderson v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Fulton v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sealy v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Berry v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- City of Birmingham v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.