Legal Opinion
State v. Cowans
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1967No. 40202PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The defendant-appellant claims that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence (1) the January confession, (2) the February confession, and (3) the rebuttal testimony of a police officer. The claims will be considered in that order.
The January confession is attacked as (a) the product of an illegal detention, McNabb v. United States, 318 U. S. 332 (1943), and Mallory v. United States, 354 U. S. 449 (1957); (b) the product of an infringement of defendant’s right to silence and right to counsel, Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 (1964), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966); and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. PerezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. ChaseOhio Supreme Court · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.