Legal Opinion

State v. Webb

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1994No. 93-1374PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

In this appeal, Webb advances twenty-six propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have also independently balanced the aggravating circumstances against mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm the sentence of death.

I. Prosecutorial Misconduct

In his first proposition of law, Webb claims that the prosecutor repeatedly commented in closing argument on Webb’s refusal to testify, violating his Fifth Amendment rights. See Griffin v. California (1965), 380 U.S. 609, 85…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API