Legal Opinion

Detroit City Council v. Detroit Mayor

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1993No. Docket 138732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Detroit City Council, appeals as of right from the trial court’s order and opinion partially granting both parties’ motions for summary disposition in this action brought pursuant to the Uniform Budgeting and Accounting Act (ubaa), MCL 141.421 et seq.; MSA 5.3228(21) et seq. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

We are called to decide, first, whether defendants (City of Detroit Mayor Coleman Young and Budget Director Walter Stecher) were required to obtain plaintiffs approval of their recommendations for eliminating the budget deficit for the 1989-90 fiscal year before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Rayford v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Detroit City Council v. StecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Detroit Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Detroit City Council v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bommarito v. Detroit Golf ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Detroit City Council v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Detroit Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API