Legal Opinion · Dissent
Johnson v. Peterbilt of Fargo, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1989No. Civ. 880149Published
1DissentMeschke, Justice
Mike Johnson was a salesman for Peter-bilt of Fargo, Inc. Their written “Salesman’s Compensation Agreement” said:
“THE SALESMAN AGREES TO DEVOTE HIS FULL TIME AND SERVICES TO THE COMPANY IN THE CAPACITY OF SALESMAN.
[[Image here]]
“COMPENSATION
“THE COMPANY WILL PAY AND SALESMAN WILL ACCEPT AS THE ENTIRE COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED AS FOLLOWS:
“NEW AND USED — TRUCKS, TRAILERS, & GLIDER KITS “10% OR MORE GROSS PROFIT = 30% OF GROSS PROFIT “0% — 9.99% GROSS PROFIT = 25% OF GROSS PROFIT
“ALL THE ABOVE PERCENTAGES WILL BE COMPUTED FROM TOTAL COST (TOTAL COST TO INCLUDE FREIGHT AND SERVICE…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heuvelman v. Triplett Electrical Instrument Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Reed v. KurdzielMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Krein v. Marian Manor Nursing HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Wisdom v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Real Estate CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- J. & B. MOTORS, INC. v. MargolisArizona Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.