Legal Opinion

J. & B. MOTORS, INC. v. Margolis

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1953No. 5602PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Defendant employed plaintiff as a used-car salesman at a salary to be computed on a five per cent commission on all- sales accomplished by him with a guaranty of $200 per month. There is no dispute concerning this agreement. Thereafter, some arrangement was made whereby plaintiff was to receive a $50 bonus on the sale of heavy-duty trucks. Defendant contends this was limited to the month of July, whereas plaintiff claims there was no such limitation. Sometime after plaintiff’s employment began another arrangement was made, whereby plaintiff assumed the duties of looking after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Podol v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Riley v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. BradyArizona Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HermSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wasko v. FrankelArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Winchester Packaging, Incorporated v. Mobil Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API