Denney v. Lawrence
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN, J.—
Introduction
Roger Denney (Roger) and Roger’s wife, Marilyn Denney, (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from a stipulated judgment of dismissal entered against them and in favor of the Press Enterprise Company (Press-Enterprise) and E. M. Lawrence (Lawrence) (collectively defendants). 1 They contend that the trial court erred when it ruled, for purposes of the plaintiffs’ defamation action, that Roger was a “limited public figure” in relationship to the controversy surrounding his brother Rodney Denney’s (Rodney) arrest, conviction, and sentencing for the killing of Rodney’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kahn v. BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Victoria Price Street v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Copp v. PaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Carver v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cabrera v. AlamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.