Legal Opinion

Denney v. Lawrence

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1994No. E010772PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, J.—

Introduction

Roger Denney (Roger) and Roger’s wife, Marilyn Denney, (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from a stipulated judgment of dismissal entered against them and in favor of the Press Enterprise Company (Press-Enterprise) and E. M. Lawrence (Lawrence) (collectively defendants). 1 They contend that the trial court erred when it ruled, for purposes of the plaintiffs’ defamation action, that Roger was a “limited public figure” in relationship to the controversy surrounding his brother Rodney Denney’s (Rodney) arrest, conviction, and sentencing for the killing of Rodney’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kahn v. BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Victoria Price Street v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Copp v. PaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Carver v. BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Cabrera v. AlamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API