Legal Opinion
House v. Road Improvement District No. 5
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 16, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.
Appellant instituted this suit in the chancery court of Conway County against appellees, attacking the validity of Road Improvement District No. 5 of Conway County and the assessments of benefits against appellant’s lands embraced within the district. The district was created, along with other districts in said county, by special act No. 245 of the Legislature of 1919. The first ground upon which the validity of the act itself is assailed is that the notice to the property owners whose lands were included in the district provided for in the act was not sufficient as to time, or upon its face,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Heinemann v. SweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Johns v. Road Improvement DistrictsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Milwee v. TribbleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paving Dists. 2 and 3 of Blytheville v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Reed v. HundleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Carney v. WalbeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Ingram v. Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 5Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Rayder v. McGehee East & West Highway DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.