Dahlsten v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Duluth, entered pursuant to the findings of Windom, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought in' the municipal court of the city of Duluth, where plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant appealed to this court. Plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal, on the ground *341that no appeal lies directly from the municipal court of that city to the supreme court. The motion is granted.
The municipal court of the city of Duluth was created by chapter 53, p. 606, Sp. Laws 1891. The act creating it provided, after defining the powers and jurisdiction of the court, that:
Any cause * * * may be removed from [the municipal court] to the supreme court * * * in like manner and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Lorentz v. Rittler v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Lamar v. ProsserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- State ex rel. Hagestad v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Combs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Smith v. Van ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Brown v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.