Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mook v. Berger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1958Published

1Dissent

Valente, J. (dissenting).

I agree that plaintiffs’ complaint was properly dismissed. No injunction should issue to require stockholders to continue in office a director or officer who •— at least for the purposes of this case — admitted misfeasance and a breach of trust. That conclusion stands irrespective of the validity or illegality of the stockholders’ agreement and the corporate by-law.

But I must dissent from the affirmance of that part of the judgment which grants declaratory judgment in favor of defendants on their counterclaim. Defendants sought a declaration that certain provisions in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Weiss v. RouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API