Mook v. Berger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Valente, J. (dissenting).
I agree that plaintiffs’ complaint was properly dismissed. No injunction should issue to require stockholders to continue in office a director or officer who •— at least for the purposes of this case — admitted misfeasance and a breach of trust. That conclusion stands irrespective of the validity or illegality of the stockholders’ agreement and the corporate by-law.
But I must dissent from the affirmance of that part of the judgment which grants declaratory judgment in favor of defendants on their counterclaim. Defendants sought a declaration that certain provisions in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Weiss v. RouthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Cohn v. Mishkoff Costello Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.