State v. Ortiz-Valdez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendant appeals a conviction for attempting to supply contraband by knowingly introducing it into a correctional facility, ORS 162.185. The issue presented is the same as that presented in a series of recent cases — whether defendant was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence of a voluntary act as required by ORS 161.095. See State v. Tippetts, 180 Or App 350, 43 P3d 455 (2002).1 We agree with defendant that Tippetts controls in this case. We therefore reverse defendant’s conviction of attempting to supply contraband and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. ThaxtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. GetzingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alex Trenton Beltz v. State of Alaska, State of Alaska v. Lesli Renee RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024
- State v. WenzellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019