Legal Opinion

State v. Getzinger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 2003No. 990231400; A111670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for supplying contraband, which he was alleged to have committed by knowingly introducing contraband into a county jail. See ORS 162.185(l)(a). At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the state had not adduced legally sufficient evidence of a voluntary act as required by ORS 161.095. See State v. Tippetts, 180 Or App 350, 43 P3d 455 (2002). The trial court denied that motion and, sitting without a jury, found defendant guilty. On appeal, defendant renews the argument that he made to the trial court. We reverse.

We view the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. GoozeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Ortiz-ValdezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. M.A.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. State of Iowa v. Sheila Marie SundallCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API