Legal Opinion

State v. Wenzell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 2019No. A166174Published

1Per curiam

*394*575Defendant, who was convicted of possession of methamphetamine (Count 1), ORS 475.894, and supplying contraband (Count 2), ORS 162.185,1 appeals. On appeal, defendant challenges his conviction for supplying contraband, asserting that the trial court plainly erred in failing to enter a judgment of acquittal on that charge because there was no evidence in the record that defendant performed a voluntary act directed toward introducing contraband into a correctional facility.2 See State v. Ortiz-Valdez , 190 Or. App. 511, 514-15, 79 P.3d 371 (2003) (to be convicted of supplying contraband, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. Ortiz-ValdezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API