Legal Opinion
Mohr v. Allen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 28, 1976No. 75 Civ. 2039 (MP)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
POLLACK, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), (3), (6), (7) Fed.R.Civ.P. on the grounds that (1) the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction on which the claims rest because the plaintiff, although he is a United States Citizen, is not a resident of any state, (2) this is an inappropriate and inconvenient forum under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, (3) plaintiff failed to join and the Court lacks jurisdiction over necessary Mexican parties who should be parties defendant to this litigation, (4) the Court lacks jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bryant v. Finnish National AirlineNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Gibbons v. Udaras Na GaeltachtaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Alcoa Steamship Co. v. M/V Nordic RegentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. v. M/V Nordic RegentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Hodson v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.